Ever since I have memories I remember wishing certain things. I remember wanting to kiss that girl, I remember wanting to play Wii, I remember wanting lots of things. However, since the beginning of time I have not had what I desired, I have had what was available.
I have never complaint, all in all, whatever I achieved to own was virtually as valuable as what I really desired, and so I just learnt how to want what was given to me. This way, all my desires would be fully fulfilled.
Nonetheless, it is getting harder each time, because I realize the truth of the situation, which is that the heart wants what it wants, and no logical process can change that when your wishes are well defined. Nowadays I do really want to be with certain girls, I really want to go to certain places, I really desire to do certain things, which are, as a whole, almost impossible to get. Therefore I am obliged either to accept my misery and let my unfulfilled desires destroy me, or I can change my mentality and convince myself that what I do have is what I really wished from the beginning.
It seems wrong when first explained, it looks as if it made sense, but it was enslaving myself, holding my own true self back, not letting me be free in all splendor. But why is it? Why does it feel weird to convince yourself to want something? Why does it feel freedom-breaking?
It is not making me less free, since I am the one deciding what to do, this initiative has been set up by me, just by myself and my own desire of not being unhappy. I am the one choosing to be less happy by changing my thoughts. Therefore, is changing you mind something wrong? Is controlling yourself something against liberty? Is nature and only nature and its natural paths the real way towards freedom?
I believe nature and its consequences sometimes lead to unhappiness, and even though we perceive natural unrest as just, there is no rational explanation to why we should just suffer if nature wants us to.
I am referring to the natural series and path of events as nature, something unchanged that follows its own path according to natural and un artificial laws. Something interesting about this is that whatever is triggered by nature is automatically assumed as fair and just, whereas is something triggered by humans leads to the same result, this result is often unjust and punishable.
Applied to the desires scenario, something artificially desired by someone is worse thought of than something desired because of pure chance, nature. For example, imagine you are in love of a very ugly person, you love that person, but he/she is so ugly you cannot tell. Then, in order to not suffer you decide to suppress your feelings, try to change them and fall in love with a much prettier but stupider boy/girl. That is something rather unjust for you and your loved one, it looks artificial and unnatural, unfair and wrong. However if you naturally and spontaneously stopped loving the ugly person and started loving the cute one, or maybe just love the cute one from the beginning, the situation would look appropriate and fair. All in all, we are ruled by nature and it is something un personal which can never be to blame for an event.
The conclusion of this is that nature is always just, or at least perceived as so, while artificial or man made changes to one's personality or wishes are morally wrong and unjust, basically because of the first principal; nature is the only just, fair and morally right maker of these things.
I am still confused, and I do not know whether I should embrace my impossible dreams or just try to be happy to what comes to me. I will probably be confused for a long time, and perhaps no answer is valid to this dilemma, maybe there is no solution, and a mixture of both paths is the more appropriate. But again, as a philosophical question, as a human who is trying to be more morally correct, what should I do?
I guess I'll have to suffer the aching pain of confusion until a new solution becomes bearable. Until then, just philosophize.


